🔗 Share this article Amorim's Critical Error? Challenging The Executives and an Unassailable Leadership Tier Turns out Ruben Amorim endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss. Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives. In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to regard him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned. The Tactical Clash Regarding System and Ideology To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past. Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it. Sir Jim Ratcliffe has allegedly suggested utilizing the attacker in an unfamiliar defensive position. Image: Getty Images The Supreme Power Behind Command But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be decided by this group”. After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker? A Modern Football Order: Executives Above Coaches This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box. Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely. The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Few And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire him for using too much that system. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.