🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where African descendants are compensated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.